created using Envato The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator has zero predictive validity for job performance. Yet it generates $20 million annually and remains one of the most popular workplace assessments. How did this happen? → Appealing narrative (16 distinct types feel personalised) → Positive framing (no "bad" types) → Low threat (people enjoy the results) → Simplicity (easy to remember and discuss) → Cultural momentum (organisations invest for decades) Here's what troubles me